LinkedIn: Implement a Semaphore
http://tutorials.jenkov.com/java-concurrency/semaphores.html
A Semaphore is a thread synchronization construct that can be used either to send signals between threads to avoid missed signals, or to guard a critical section like you would with a lock. Java 5 comes with semaphore implementations in the
Java 5 comes with a built-in
Using a semaphore like this you can avoid missed signals. You will call
The names
http://tutorials.jenkov.com/java-concurrency/semaphores.html
Semaphores
A Semaphore is a thread synchronization construct that can be used either to send signals between threads to avoid missed signals, or to guard a critical section like you would with a lock. Java 5 comes with semaphore implementations in the
java.util.concurrent
package so you don't have to implement your own semaphores. Still, it can be useful to know the theory behind their implementation and use.Java 5 comes with a built-in
Semaphore
so you don't have to implement your own. You can read more about it in the java.util.concurrent.Semaphore text, in my java.util.concurrent
tutorial.Simple Semaphore
Here is a simpleSemaphore
implementation:public class Semaphore { private boolean signal = false; public synchronized void take() { this.signal = true; this.notify(); } public synchronized void release() throws InterruptedException{ while(!this.signal) wait(); this.signal = false; } }The
take()
method sends a signal which is stored internally in the Semaphore
. The release()
method waits for a signal. When received the signal flag is cleared again, and the release()
method exited.Using a semaphore like this you can avoid missed signals. You will call
take()
instead of notify()
andrelease()
instead of wait()
. If the call to take()
happens before the call to release()
the thread callingrelease()
will still know that take()
was called, because the signal is stored internally in the signal
variable. This is not the case with wait()
and notify()
.The names
take()
and release()
may seem a bit odd when using a semaphore for signaling. The names origin from the use of semaphores as locks, as explained later in this text. In that case the names make more sense.Using Semaphores for Signaling
Here is a simplified example of two threads signaling each other using a
Semaphore
:Semaphore semaphore = new Semaphore(); SendingThread sender = new SendingThread(semaphore); ReceivingThread receiver = new ReceivingThread(semaphore); receiver.start(); sender.start();
public class SendingThread { Semaphore semaphore = null; public SendingThread(Semaphore semaphore){ this.semaphore = semaphore; } public void run(){ while(true){ //do something, then signal this.semaphore.take(); } } }
public class RecevingThread { Semaphore semaphore = null; public ReceivingThread(Semaphore semaphore){ this.semaphore = semaphore; } public void run(){ while(true){ this.semaphore.release(); //receive signal, then do something... } } }
Counting Semaphore
The
Semaphore
implementation in the previous section does not count the number of signals sent to it bytake()
method calls. We can change the Semaphore
to do so. This is called a counting semaphore. Here is a simple implementation of a counting semaphore:public class CountingSemaphore { private int signals = 0; public synchronized void take() { this.signals++; this.notify(); } public synchronized void release() throws InterruptedException{ while(this.signals == 0) wait(); this.signals--; } }
Bounded Semaphore
The
CoutingSemaphore
has no upper bound on how many signals it can store. We can change the semaphore implementation to have an upper bound, like this:public class BoundedSemaphore { private int signals = 0; private int bound = 0; public BoundedSemaphore(int upperBound){ this.bound = upperBound; } public synchronized void take() throws InterruptedException{ while(this.signals == bound) wait(); this.signals++; this.notify(); } public synchronized void release() throws InterruptedException{ while(this.signals == 0) wait(); this.signals--; this.notify(); } }
Notice how the
take()
method now blocks if the number of signals is equal to the upper bound. Not until a thread has called release()
will the thread calling take()
be allowed to deliver its signal, if theBoundedSemaphore
has reached its upper signal limit.Using Semaphores as Locks
It is possible to use a bounded semaphore as a lock. To do so, set the upper bound to 1, and have the call to
take()
and release()
guard the critical section. Here is an example:BoundedSemaphore semaphore = new BoundedSemaphore(1); ... semaphore.take(); try{ //critical section } finally { semaphore.release(); }
In contrast to the signaling use case the methods
take()
and release()
are now called by the same thread. Since only one thread is allowed to take the semaphore, all other threads calling take()
will be blocked untilrelease()
is called. The call to release()
will never block since there has always been a call to take()
first.
You can also use a bounded semaphore to limit the number of threads allowed into a section of code. For instance, in the example above, what would happen if you set the limit of the
BoundedSemaphore
to 5? 5 threads would be allowed to enter the critical section at a time. You would have to make sure though, that the thread operations do not conflict for these 5 threads, or you application will fail.
The
relase()
method is called from inside a finally-block to make sure it is called even if an exception is thrown from the critical section.